D-1997-01-1997_OVE

L’ASSOCIATION MIDICALE MONDIALE, INC ASOCIACION MEDICA MUNDIAL, INC
THE WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONI INC.
B. P. 63 – 01212 FERNEY·VOLTAIRE Cedex. France
28. avenue des Alpes – 01210 FERNEY-VOLTAIRE, Franca
Telephone : 04 50 40 75 75
F8x : 04 50 40 59 37
November 1997
Cable Address:
WOMEDAS, Ferney·Voltaire
10.160
Original: English
WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION DECLARATION ·
WITH GUIDEUNES FOR
CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTH CARE
Adopted by the 49th World Medical Assembly
Hamburg, Gennany, November 1997
PREAMBLE
1. The purpose of health care is to prevent, to diagnose or to treat illness and to
maintain and to promote the health of the population. The goal of quality review in
health care is continuous improvement of the quality of services provided for patients
and the population, and of the,~Clys and means of producing these services.
2. The obligation continuously to improve one’s professional ability and to evaluate
the methods used is included in the ethical codes of physicians. According to them a
physician has to maintain and increase his/her knowledge and skills. He/she shall
recommend only examinations and treatments that are known to be effective and
appropriate according to the state of medical art.
Purpose of the guidelines
3. Physicians and health care institutions have a moral obligation to strive for
continuous improvement of services. The purpose of these guidelines is to
strengthen this pursuit by means of quality review practices and to create ethical
grounds for such review practices, like clinical peer review.
R
E
S
C
I
N
D
E
D
GUIDELINES
Application of the guidelines
2 10.160
4. Ethical guidelines for continuous quality improvement concem all physicians,
institutions providing health care services for patients, and producers of review
services.
Obligation for quality review
5. All physicians, other health care professionals (including health administrators)
and institutions have to aspire to improvement of their work. Active participation by
everyone in clinical audit and in quality review initiatives should be encouraged.
Quality review evaluations can be used for independent external audit, and with the
aim of accreditation.
Standards for good quality work
6. Those involved in work with patients need to specify the standards necessary .
for good quality work and for the evaluation of the quality of the work. The resources
and skill mix of staff within health care establishments should be adequate to attain
the required standards of good quality work
7. Patient data, whether recorded on paper or on computer, has to be written and
?~~~~P’cft4dt”8!ltef;~elR~mc~Be801f;Pape?or oA”‘co~rfipute;r;1raSlo 6e-wnften-and
preserved with care, taking into consideration the obligations for confidentiality.
Procedures, decisions and other matters connected with patients need to be
recorded in a form which will allow information for measuring specific standards to be
available when needed.
8. Health care professionals should have adequate opportunities to maintain and
develop their knowledge and skills. Recommendations and clinical guidelines should A.
be easily available for those requiring them. Health care institutions need to create ..
quality systems for their own use and to ensure that instructions concerning such
systems are followed.
Recognition of quality review
9. All physicians should continuously evaluate the quality of their work and their .
level of ability by self-review methods.
10. The quality of health care can be assessed by both internal and external
methods. The agencies for both processes have to be Widely approved, and the
methods used must be generally accepted and based on research or sufficient
knOWledge.
11. Internal clinical peer review, observation of examination and of treatment
methods, comparison with others, observation of the organisation’s ability to act and
R
E
S
C
I
N
D
E
D
3 10.160
monitoring of the feedback from patients have to be continuous activities undertaken
by every service provider.
12. External quality review initiatives, such as external peer review and audit,
should be carried out with a frequency corresponding to the evolution of the field and
always when there is special reason for it.
Confidentiality of patients records
13. Patient records can be used in quality review. Patients should be made aware
of the use of their records in quality review. Their medical records should be kept
confidential and anonymised and should not be accessible to inappropriate persons.
All reports, photographs, videos and comparative data have to be presented In such
a form that the patients involved in a review cannot be identified;
Confidentiality of peer review
14. A precondition for successful peer review is the freedom of institutions and
physicians to agree to be reviewed and their commitment to review. It is
recommended that informed voluntary consent be obtained from those to be
reviewed.
15. The results of a review belong to those subscribing to it. The results can be
‘I
t
5?rI fWtf’nmam;i~rw Rmnrw.aI,Qur.9QAg§JlnlY.,wifhJh~ 9gQrpV~! .Q
f .tb~:U~lJb~.rjb_er
used for comparisons and general purposes only with the approval of the subscriber
and those involved in the review, unless national legislation provides otherwise.
16. A provider of services can inform his/her customers aboutthe results of quality
review and use them in marketing his/her services, provided this is allowed by the
law.
17. The review of the work of an individual physician is the responsibility of the
physician himself/herself and his/her superior physician. Information regarding an
individual physician should not be puollshed without the consent of the physician
concerned.
18. An external review shall not reveal to others the results of the review, or other
information obtained during the review. without the written permission of the
subscriberof the review.
Ethics committees
19. Generally approved ethical principles of health care and national codes of
medical ethics have to be followed in quality review.
20. If doubts are raised about ethical issues in a review project they should be
referred to an ethics committee. However, in general the routine submission of
review projects for approval by ethics committees is not necessary.
R
E
S
C
I
N
D
E
D
competence of the reviewer
4 10.160
21. The reviewer has to be experienced in the field that the review concerns and
competent in quality development techniques and in clinical audit methods. When
medical care is reviewed, the reviewer must be a physician. The reviewer has to be
accepted by those to be reviewed, whenever possible.
Impartiality of the review
22. The chosen reviewer must be as impartiaJ and as independent as possible.
He/she has to be well acquainted with the activities of those to be reviewed. The
reviewer has to be objective in hiS/her report. His/her conclusions should be based
on a critical evaluation of observations and facts. The reviewer must not allow
commercial or competitive matters to influence the content of hislher statement.
Review and supervision by authorities
23. Quality review of health care and continuous quality improvement of services is
a part of the activity of every physician and institution. The supervision of
professional activities made by health care authorities is a distinct activity and should
be kept separate from health care review. The results of a review of physicians can
be used for the purposes of supervising authorities only by a separate mutual
agreement between the health care authorities and the physicians concerned, unless
national legislation providesotherwise.
IICUIVI lal n:::YI~Ii:UIUII provmes oInerwlse.
R
E
S
C
I
N
D
E
D